From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,8d52d4fbf051d828
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.181.11.234 with SMTP id el10mr823449wid.2.1347644530101;
        Fri, 14 Sep 2012 10:42:10 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 ed8ni64841452wib.0!nntp.google.com!feeder1.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!85.12.40.138.MISMATCH!xlned.com!feeder5.xlned.com!feed.xsnews.nl!border-1.ams.xsnews.nl!border4.nntp.ams.giganews.com!border2.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news.panservice.it!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder2.enfer-du-nord.net!usenet-fr.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder2-2.proxad.net!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool2.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail
Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2012 18:06:25 +0200
From: Georg Bauhaus <rm.dash-bauhaus@futureapps.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7;
 rv:15.0) Gecko/20120824 Thunderbird/15.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Status of GNADE ODBC under Debian 64-bit
References: <fw8uijju18zy$.11cg80j2ky77j$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <85r4qe9n5e.fsf@stephe-leake.org>
In-Reply-To: <85r4qe9n5e.fsf@stephe-leake.org>
Message-ID: <504a1b7e$0$6561$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net>
Organization: Arcor
NNTP-Posting-Date: 07 Sep 2012 18:06:22 CEST
NNTP-Posting-Host: f740ed56.newsspool4.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=790cNoa\Bg^YQ5E:l<XC@S4IUK<Cl32<Q4Fo<]lROoRQ8kF<OcfhCO[5QcE1AObAS\nc\616M64>ZLh>_cHTX3j]]9XQ0Ei3iAY
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: 2012-09-07T18:06:22+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 07.09.12 11:51, Stephen Leake wrote:
> I suggest you switch to gnatcoll, which includes Ada front-ends for
> postgres and SQLite3 (but not ODBC). That code is better written, and
> actively maintained, supported by paying customers. 

GNATcoll relies a few GNAT specific packages; any experience whether
these work with other Ada compilers?

with GNAT.Strings, GNATCOLL.*, GNAT.Calendar... etc. Nothing
terrible, and I am not complaining, just mentioning.

Also, for those who might need copy protection for their
sources, the license (GPL) might not be what they'd like, IINM.