From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,9983e856ed268154
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.204.130.7 with SMTP id q7mr549612bks.2.1345803481995;
        Fri, 24 Aug 2012 03:18:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.180.105.2 with SMTP id gi2mr293966wib.4.1345803480521;
        Fri, 24 Aug 2012 03:18:00 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 m12ni129035bkm.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!7no41414025wig.0!news-out.google.com!q11ni290208665wiw.1!nntp.google.com!feeder1-2.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder2-2.proxad.net!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool3.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 12:17:20 +0200
From: Georg Bauhaus <rm.dash-bauhaus@futureapps.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7;
 rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Should Inline be private in the private part of a package spec?
References: <501bd285$0$6564$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net>
   <50677fa2-7f82-4ccc-8c56-161bf67fefe1@googlegroups.com>
 <k04a26$doi$1@munin.nbi.dk> <op.wius1gdbka8ora@aspire.local>
 <k0bubm$loe$1@munin.nbi.dk> <op.wi0fliuoka8ora@aspire.local>
 <44bb5c96-a158-41c1-8e7d-ae83b2c0aca1@googlegroups.com>
 <1mchat48i3fos.1ksbz02nuzf5f$.dlg@40tude.net> <k0ei0u$214$1@munin.nbi.dk>
 <rznvpohy5adk$.1of2k7nklsaam.dlg@40tude.net>
 <502b832f$0$6579$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
 <vqx5pu5yd4m7.jlystys02zcx$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <502bc4df$0$6574$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
 <sgy28ka2rw0a.119txios2lu0g$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <502bd3e6$0$6574$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
 <17qgsq5y7or0v.16z18fmcew1lt$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <502c08f9$0$6573$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
 <k1133n$s51$1@munin.nbi.dk>
 <5034d558$0$6581$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
 <k13kh1$fh9$1@munin.nbi.dk>
 <5035e241$0$6584$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
 <k16vj7$nn2$1@munin.nbi.dk>
In-Reply-To: <k16vj7$nn2$1@munin.nbi.dk>
Message-ID: <503754ae$0$6582$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
Organization: Arcor
NNTP-Posting-Date: 24 Aug 2012 12:17:18 CEST
NNTP-Posting-Host: 398811a7.newsspool3.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=YYD>ag6^?TY[7Non7UCi8UMcF=Q^Z^V3X4Fo<]lROoRQ8kF<OcfhCO[D3VD?Y_Xj[Ync\616M64>ZLh>_cHTX3j]TT_6RRI_cES
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: 2012-08-24T12:17:18+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 24.08.12 06:22, Randy Brukardt wrote:

>> Ada software engineers are asked to use a domain specific vocabulary
>> in their program (which here is about car status). The status web
>> server engineers can be asked the same when producing tagged text
>> they then delegate to the web guys who write the XSLT to be run in
>> the browser. I think Vasiliy already indicated how. And yes, it has
>> to come from somewhere.
> 
> You need to go to "Overengineering Anonymous". The original problem 
> statement was "send to a browser", which means HTML has to be present 
> somewhere. All the rest of this is huge amounts of overkill.

This is the way larger customers produce software based systems.
The procedures are such that several teams work at their own pace.
Changes need to be made to modules of the system, if possible.
It is not the kind of system where you have a single server
maintained by a single team. The HTML+CSS+... needs to be the
result of they system's modules working.

You can't have all customers of ${car maker} drive their cars
to the next shop to have staff install an updated part of
a web page, can you?