From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,9983e856ed268154 X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Received: by 10.66.77.39 with SMTP id p7mr195324paw.0.1345721664945; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 04:34:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.180.75.8 with SMTP id y8mr948849wiv.4.1345721664533; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 04:34:24 -0700 (PDT) Path: a5ni5207pbv.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!7no38725087wig.0!news-out.google.com!q11ni274482180wiw.1!nntp.google.com!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!usenet-fr.net!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder1.enfer-du-nord.net!newsfeed.eweka.nl!feeder3.eweka.nl!81.171.88.15.MISMATCH!eweka.nl!lightspeed.eweka.nl!npeer.de.kpn-eurorings.net!npeer-ng0.de.kpn-eurorings.net!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool4.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 13:33:57 +0200 From: Georg Bauhaus User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Should Inline be private in the private part of a package spec? References: <501bd285$0$6564$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net> <50326457$0$6576$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net> <1qril0ny3eczr$.1vlhpbrjyyb8k.dlg@40tude.net> <503375ac$0$6565$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net> <1vglgit7vnu4l$.2ytljabrhk2.dlg@40tude.net> <5033986c$0$6573$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net> <62h5nifarvom.1myeqdyevhefq.dlg@40tude.net> <5033b4d8$0$6571$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net> <5033ff28$0$6185$ba4acef3@reader.news.orange.fr> <5034dac1$0$6579$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net> <50350d35$0$6579$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net> <1xdzh15anpuc0.1xw8mwmojasjk$.dlg@40tude.net> <50354c95$0$6577$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net> <1sfidfvz480e7$.l49woc2l4lji.dlg@40tude.net> <5035f059$0$6580$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net> <1i9sfhbz3harl$.1ihaky0f5ne8d$.dlg@40tude.net> In-Reply-To: <1i9sfhbz3harl$.1ihaky0f5ne8d$.dlg@40tude.net> Message-ID: <50361526$0$6577$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net> Organization: Arcor NNTP-Posting-Date: 23 Aug 2012 13:33:58 CEST NNTP-Posting-Host: 13a34203.newsspool3.arcor-online.net X-Trace: DXC=oVdJ@IIeS<^[7Non7UCi8UMcF=Q^Z^V3X4Fo<]lROoRQ8kF_ljHi\nc\616M64>ZLh>_cHTX3j]Rd;RNNfBijZ X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: 2012-08-23T13:33:58+02:00 List-Id: On 23.08.12 12:13, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote: > Nobody needs either parsing or guessing in order to exchange structured > data. Nobody needs either parsing or guessing in order to understand data of *known* structure. Which is the point. When endpoints lack this knowledge and there exists no way of obtaining the knowledge from elsewhere, then hints in the data will help.