From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,9983e856ed268154
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.204.154.76 with SMTP id n12mr157772bkw.1.1345721419567;
        Thu, 23 Aug 2012 04:30:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.180.105.2 with SMTP id gi2mr253515wib.4.1345721418789;
        Thu, 23 Aug 2012 04:30:18 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 m12ni126129bkm.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!yt1no41474809wib.1!news-out.google.com!q11ni274457555wiw.1!nntp.google.com!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!news.internetdienste.de!noris.net!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool3.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 13:30:17 +0200
From: Georg Bauhaus <rm.dash-bauhaus@futureapps.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7;
 rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Should Inline be private in the private part of a package spec?
References: <50353a25$0$6581$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
 <1x29v2l5crksa$.17qggd3ghy94c$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <746632025367360149.847942rm-host.bauhaus-maps.arcor.de@news.arcor.de>
 <19yh6raqplxd9$.ubx1vlm6le9i.dlg@40tude.net>
 <5035e4f9$0$6572$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
 <1dt9qbimr88yf$.1rx3ijvu1okdr$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <5035fec0$0$6566$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
 <3ovjseci3jkm.vkwl0h05ceuj.dlg@40tude.net>
In-Reply-To: <3ovjseci3jkm.vkwl0h05ceuj.dlg@40tude.net>
Message-ID: <5036144a$0$6577$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
Organization: Arcor
NNTP-Posting-Date: 23 Aug 2012 13:30:18 CEST
NNTP-Posting-Host: 13a34203.newsspool3.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=e:CFaMElJaU\PS5Xo=M[RVMcF=Q^Z^V3X4Fo<]lROoRQ8kF<OcfhCO[80[U>_ljHi\nc\616M64>ZLh>_cHTX3j]gDjfXiACXkX
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: 2012-08-23T13:30:18+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 23.08.12 12:27, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Aug 2012 11:58:24 +0200, Georg Bauhaus wrote:
> 
>> On 23.08.12 10:38, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote:
>>
>>> The point is straight and simple: when you are free to choose never ever
>>> use XML. There is no technical reason to choose XML.
>>
>> For weeks now I have been trying to explain that in my networks,
> 
> For weeks your are trying to explain how wrong decisions led or might lead
> to XML. I don't argue with that. I merely state that neither of these
> decisions could be necessary due to technical reasons.
> 
> Human error /= technical reason

To err is human. To fail is technical.