From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,9983e856ed268154
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.66.80.166 with SMTP id s6mr1911158pax.30.1345990600489;
        Sun, 26 Aug 2012 07:16:40 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 t10ni76305317pbh.0!nntp.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news.snarked.org!newsfeed.news.ucla.edu!ihnp4.UCSD.Edu!nntp.ucr.edu!solaris.cc.vt.edu!news.vt.edu!news.glorb.com!xlned.com!feeder1.xlned.com!npeer.de.kpn-eurorings.net!npeer-ng0.de.kpn-eurorings.net!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool3.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 21:59:36 +0200
From: Georg Bauhaus <rm.dash-bauhaus@futureapps.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7;
 rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Should Inline be private in the private part of a package spec?
References: <501bd285$0$6564$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net>
 <502e9039$0$6557$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net>
 <40tmogy4d1b5.1kc2gm8qfrkdu.dlg@40tude.net>
 <503240ed$0$6569$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
 <ciztlfv7tfhf$.taw9f39y1oa4$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <50326457$0$6576$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
 <1qril0ny3eczr$.1vlhpbrjyyb8k.dlg@40tude.net>
 <503375ac$0$6565$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
 <1vglgit7vnu4l$.2ytljabrhk2.dlg@40tude.net>
 <5033986c$0$6573$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
 <62h5nifarvom.1myeqdyevhefq.dlg@40tude.net>
 <5033b4d8$0$6571$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
 <gpcuiu6p58gd$.118wuad9bdmvo$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <5033ff28$0$6185$ba4acef3@reader.news.orange.fr>
 <k7637a11gmnm$.1lv7ly66jmka8$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <5034dac1$0$6579$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
 <gqe8rxff4blh$.118of9mfkr6y8.dlg@40tude.net>
 <50350d35$0$6579$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
 <1xdzh15anpuc0.1xw8mwmojasjk$.dlg@40tude.net>
In-Reply-To: <1xdzh15anpuc0.1xw8mwmojasjk$.dlg@40tude.net>
Message-ID: <50353a25$0$6581$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
Organization: Arcor
NNTP-Posting-Date: 22 Aug 2012 21:59:33 CEST
NNTP-Posting-Host: ead246da.newsspool3.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=R5gJ3VCFZ2Jk:C4l9A;OcOMcF=Q^Z^V3H4Fo<]lROoRA8kF<OcfhCOKN;4mkgO5a?KPCY\c7>ejVH]6BU]5=I;nG?fo>N=4``fF
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: 2012-08-22T21:59:33+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 22.08.12 19:44, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote:
>> I need to write many parsers if I can't use XML. I use data not
>> >generated by our programs.
> In that case this is irrelevant to the issue. Other programs use formats
> they do. If that requires parsing that is their problem.

Next time I download a PDF from A Big Bank or from a corporation,
destined to be a PDF document, I'll tell them that it is their
problem if I need to parse it.

Next time I download a freely available entry from a financial
or technical blog of not so strictly conforming quality, I tell
them it's their problem if I need to parse this.

Good joke.
Not sure what they do when I tell them. Whether they will just
laugh their heads off or stare in utter astonishment at such
a weirdo appearance.