From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,9983e856ed268154
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.205.126.4 with SMTP id gu4mr1687670bkc.8.1345566338181;
        Tue, 21 Aug 2012 09:25:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.180.24.202 with SMTP id w10mr2891836wif.0.1345566337743;
        Tue, 21 Aug 2012 09:25:37 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 m12ni123430bkm.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!7no33363368wig.0!news-out.google.com!n2ni244783172win.0!nntp.google.com!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!news.teledata-fn.de!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool1.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 18:25:37 +0200
From: Georg Bauhaus <rm.dash-bauhaus@futureapps.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7;
 rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Should Inline be private in the private part of a package spec?
References: <501bd285$0$6564$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net>
 <502bd3e6$0$6574$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
 <17qgsq5y7or0v.16z18fmcew1lt$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <502c149e$0$6579$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
 <ak8h9w7770bx$.ncrikznng6v3$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <502cd701$0$6568$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
 <pstv4iafyysv$.1mq6dicsj9my0.dlg@40tude.net>
 <502d3c68$0$6572$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
 <mhbnq53dwqt2.r7w4k1ptmxf1$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <502e9039$0$6557$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net>
 <40tmogy4d1b5.1kc2gm8qfrkdu.dlg@40tude.net>
 <503240ed$0$6569$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
 <ciztlfv7tfhf$.taw9f39y1oa4$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <50326457$0$6576$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
 <1qril0ny3eczr$.1vlhpbrjyyb8k.dlg@40tude.net>
 <503375ac$0$6565$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
 <1vglgit7vnu4l$.2ytljabrhk2.dlg@40tude.net>
 <5033986c$0$6573$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
 <62h5nifarvom.1myeqdyevhefq.dlg@40tude.net>
In-Reply-To: <62h5nifarvom.1myeqdyevhefq.dlg@40tude.net>
Message-ID: <5033b680$0$6571$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
Organization: Arcor
NNTP-Posting-Date: 21 Aug 2012 18:25:37 CEST
NNTP-Posting-Host: 4cf32f4d.newsspool3.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=nC?c?E:>U`FlU`@c^jLCbJMcF=Q^Z^V3H4Fo<]lROoRA8kF<OcfhCOKLSZBP=Ik7^Onc\616M64>JLh>_cHTX3jMQUW0:WU9_`C
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: 2012-08-21T18:25:37+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 21.08.12 17:06, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote:
> I presented no examples at all.


You have shown a listing that exemplifies a situation
that has, many times, led to the adoption of XML for
the exchange of data.