From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,9983e856ed268154
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.66.74.41 with SMTP id q9mr2618598pav.41.1345565944476;
        Tue, 21 Aug 2012 09:19:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.181.11.234 with SMTP id el10mr2542373wid.2.1345565944085;
        Tue, 21 Aug 2012 09:19:04 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 kg8ni7725pbc.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!yt1no36131217wib.1!news-out.google.com!n2ni244723271win.0!nntp.google.com!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!npeer.de.kpn-eurorings.net!npeer-ng0.de.kpn-eurorings.net!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool1.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 18:18:32 +0200
From: Georg Bauhaus <rm.dash-bauhaus@futureapps.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7;
 rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Should Inline be private in the private part of a package spec?
References: <501bd285$0$6564$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net>
 <502bd3e6$0$6574$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
 <17qgsq5y7or0v.16z18fmcew1lt$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <502c149e$0$6579$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
 <ak8h9w7770bx$.ncrikznng6v3$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <502cd701$0$6568$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
 <pstv4iafyysv$.1mq6dicsj9my0.dlg@40tude.net>
 <502d3c68$0$6572$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
 <mhbnq53dwqt2.r7w4k1ptmxf1$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <502e9039$0$6557$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net>
 <40tmogy4d1b5.1kc2gm8qfrkdu.dlg@40tude.net>
 <503240ed$0$6569$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
 <ciztlfv7tfhf$.taw9f39y1oa4$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <50326457$0$6576$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
 <1qril0ny3eczr$.1vlhpbrjyyb8k.dlg@40tude.net>
 <503375ac$0$6565$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
 <1vglgit7vnu4l$.2ytljabrhk2.dlg@40tude.net>
 <5033986c$0$6573$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
 <62h5nifarvom.1myeqdyevhefq.dlg@40tude.net>
In-Reply-To: <62h5nifarvom.1myeqdyevhefq.dlg@40tude.net>
Message-ID: <5033b4d8$0$6571$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
Organization: Arcor
NNTP-Posting-Date: 21 Aug 2012 18:18:32 CEST
NNTP-Posting-Host: 4cf32f4d.newsspool3.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=G3>oBbn]QT8RLigj];iP=8McF=Q^Z^V384Fo<]lROoR18kF<OcfhCO;LSZBP=Ik7^?nc\616M64>:Lh>_cHTX3j=:C4`jW5>`^3
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: 2012-08-21T18:18:32+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 21.08.12 17:06, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote:
> "Transformation of XML documents" does not look like a practical problem to
> make substantial arguments about, it looks like a solution for a problem
> yet to be stated, of which existence is in question, so far.


Today's computers exchange data using XML documents. They employ
even driven parsers (SAX), and XSL transformations, to good effect;
not usually within a systems (what for?), but between systems.

So what is it that does not exist?