From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,INVALID_DATE,
	MSGID_SHORT autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!harvard!talcott!panda!genrad!decvax!decwrl!glacier!kestrel!ladkin
From: ladkin@kestrel.ARPA (Peter Ladkin)
Newsgroups: net.lang,net.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Integer division: a winner declared
Message-ID: <5030@kestrel.ARPA>
Date: Thu, 20-Feb-86 23:12:58 EST
Article-I.D.: kestrel.5030
Posted: Thu Feb 20 23:12:58 1986
Date-Received: Mon, 24-Feb-86 06:19:00 EST
References: <11610@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU> <5100003@ccvaxa> <548@ism780c.UUCP> <11923@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU>
Organization: Kestrel Institute, Palo Alto, CA
Keywords: Ada and DoD
Xref: linus net.lang:1924 net.lang.ada:649
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <11923@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU>, weemba@brahms.BERKELEY.EDU 
(Matthew P. Wiener) writes:
> You may be interested that many of the largest defense companies/contractors
> consider Ada to be a complete joke and have no intention of making it 
> available
> unless their programmers start screaming and begging for it.  This includes
> Los Alamos National Labs, Lawrence Livermore Labs, 
> the National Security Agency,
> NASA and Lockheed.

Considering ADA to be flawed - not in one of your cases.
Having no intention of making it available, again false in two of
your quoted list.
>From first hand knowledge.

There is enormous pressure to write in ADA for DOD work.
DOE? No idea.

Peter Ladkin