From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,520d0a2db72fbbc4 X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Received: by 10.66.77.41 with SMTP id p9mr1807963paw.8.1345490843965; Mon, 20 Aug 2012 12:27:23 -0700 (PDT) Path: p10ni114747476pbh.1!nntp.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!novia!news-peer1!btnet!zen.net.uk!hamilton.zen.co.uk!xlned.com!feeder5.xlned.com!feed.xsnews.nl!border-1.ams.xsnews.nl!plix.pl!newsfeed2.plix.pl!news.mi.ras.ru!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!news.astraweb.com!border3.a.newsrouter.astraweb.com!newsfeed101.telia.com!starscream.dk.telia.net!jazz.dk.telia.net!not-for-mail Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 22:22:40 +0200 From: erlo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120714 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Feedback on OpenIndiana ? References: In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <502ea810$0$2940$f40e02c5@shockwave.dk.telia.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: 62.199.249.244 X-Trace: 1345234960 shockwave.dk.telia.net 2940 62.199.249.244:52839 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: 2012-08-17T22:22:40+02:00 List-Id: On 08/17/2012 06:52 PM, Patrick wrote: > > I am considering deploying a binary only application. I would prefer a posix based OS and I would prefer to keep Linux closed source free. > Have you considered a BSD variant? I do think they are POSIX compliant. (And the license is no-nonsense) > I am looking at the OpenIndiana project: > http://wiki.openindiana.org > > the OI license allows linking with other licenses: > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_Development_and_Distribution_License > > Currently there does not appear to be any Ada support. > > If the OS looks right I might try to port an ada enabled gcc over, currently their gcc does not have ada support. > > Any feedback is welcome, thanks-Patrick >