From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,9983e856ed268154 X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Received: by 10.180.103.197 with SMTP id fy5mr626160wib.1.1345237601777; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 14:06:41 -0700 (PDT) Path: q11ni181629304wiw.1!nntp.google.com!feeder1.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!85.12.40.138.MISMATCH!xlned.com!feeder5.xlned.com!feed.xsnews.nl!border-1.ams.xsnews.nl!plix.pl!newsfeed2.plix.pl!wsisiz.edu.pl!news.icm.edu.pl!news.nask.pl!news.nask.org.pl!news.unit0.net!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder2.enfer-du-nord.net!news.mixmin.net!news2.arglkargh.de!news.karotte.org!uucp.gnuu.de!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool4.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 18:53:09 +0200 From: Georg Bauhaus User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Should Inline be private in the private part of a package spec? References: <501bd285$0$6564$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net> <502005b6$0$9510$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net> <50203ca2$0$9512$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net> <502040c0$0$9510$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net> <50677fa2-7f82-4ccc-8c56-161bf67fefe1@googlegroups.com> <44bb5c96-a158-41c1-8e7d-ae83b2c0aca1@googlegroups.com> <1mchat48i3fos.1ksbz02nuzf5f$.dlg@40tude.net> <502b832f$0$6579$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net> <502bc4df$0$6574$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net> In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <502bd3e6$0$6574$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net> Organization: Arcor NNTP-Posting-Date: 15 Aug 2012 18:52:54 CEST NNTP-Posting-Host: 7f976a09.newsspool3.arcor-online.net X-Trace: DXC=RPDQ0?^6\STYI9]OHn9o5^McF=Q^Z^V3X4Fo<]lROoRQ8kFZLh>_cHTX3j]S_2I\Z[CXDX X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: 2012-08-15T18:52:54+02:00 List-Id: On 15.08.12 18:24, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote: > On Wed, 15 Aug 2012 17:49:01 +0200, Georg Bauhaus wrote: > >> On 15.08.12 13:55, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote: >>> On Wed, 15 Aug 2012 13:08:37 +0200, Georg Bauhaus wrote: >>> >>>> I would say that a network connecting the electrical devices >>>> of a car does not counts as heterogeneous. >>> >>> How are the ECU, navigation system, ABS, windshield wiper homogenous? >> >> They are homogeneous in that the 4 suppliers agree to be supplying >> for the same 1 system, under the "umbrella-notion" of car >> electronics. > > I see, not to forget that the gravitational constant is same too. That > evidently makes it homogenous... Dropping the blinders will make you see how people decide which data format is adequate under the respective circumstances. I have tried to supply hooks for formalization of these situational variables. Apply fuzzy logic.