From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,163994d4f34e92d0
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.224.78.205 with SMTP id m13mr391648qak.7.1343910286980;
        Thu, 02 Aug 2012 05:24:46 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 a15ni8271448qag.0!nntp.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nx02.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!novia!feeder3.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!195.208.113.1.MISMATCH!goblin3!goblin.stu.neva.ru!news.matabio.net!jeffrey.matabio.net!thue.elzevir.fr!nntpfeed.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder2-2.proxad.net!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool2.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 16:07:11 +0200
From: Georg Bauhaus <rm.dash-bauhaus@futureapps.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7;
 rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713
	Thunderbird/14.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: how to tell gnatmake to send executables to a different directory
	when compiling multi source?
References: <jv2vu5$9tm$1@speranza.aioe.org>
 <p646bl8ekmhm.qkoxmbj6j4fq$.dlg@40tude.net> <jv376e$sla$1@speranza.aioe.org>
 <214bbd15-f7cb-4710-a6a7-64f37923bf4e@googlegroups.com>
 <jv3c8f$8oq$1@speranza.aioe.org> <87wr1moexq.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org>
 <jv3g7h$ib4$1@speranza.aioe.org> <87sjcaoa08.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org>
 <op.wh7xsqqmka8ora@aspire.local> <wcc6296cpvg.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
 <op.wh8gj1ckka8ora@aspire.local> <jv4tdn$mgc$1@speranza.aioe.org>
 <op.wh9axtd0ka8ora@aspire.local>
 <50167d29$0$6570$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net>
 <op.wh9fpvnpka8ora@aspire.local>
In-Reply-To: <op.wh9fpvnpka8ora@aspire.local>
Message-ID: <50169505$0$6548$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net>
Organization: Arcor
NNTP-Posting-Date: 30 Jul 2012 16:07:01 CEST
NNTP-Posting-Host: 9d7c6d91.newsspool4.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=;7T^OVN^gcH^B]`=U:WelB4IUK<Cl32<A4Fo<]lROoRA8kF<OcfhCOK0cGjm6MEWaFnc\616M64>JLh>_cHTX3jM3Qmg1:HSfbC
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: 2012-07-30T16:07:01+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 30.07.12 14:59, Vasiliy Molostov wrote:
> But better and faster car can not make neighbour's car devil or incorrect.
> It is weak logic to accept that having better tool turns other tools (not
> yours) to a devil thing.

A non-devilish car (Ada compilation process) won't make the
neighbor's car (C + recursive make + autoconf + Unix) the devil.
But if it already is---like so many, the crappy things bumping
into others, driving over poor animals surprised by the cars'
squiggly motions, etc---then your exemplar of a well behaved
vehicle might make others see what those neighbors' cars really
are.