From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,735c710b5e547bad
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.224.138.146 with SMTP id a18mr11588486qau.6.1343789469803;
        Tue, 31 Jul 2012 19:51:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.66.77.101 with SMTP id r5mr2916886paw.27.1343789445134;
        Tue, 31 Jul 2012 19:50:45 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 a15ni14727975qag.0!nntp.google.com!4no1108554pbo.1!news-out.google.com!g9ni9633010pbo.0!nntp.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nrc-news.nrc.ca!goblin1!goblin3!goblin.stu.neva.ru!usenet.pasdenom.info!dedibox.gegeweb.org!gegeweb.eu!nntpfeed.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder2-2.proxad.net!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool3.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2012 13:58:25 +0200
From: Georg Bauhaus <rm.dash-bauhaus@futureapps.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7;
 rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ada 2005 puzzle
References: <1arp60wtxes8h$.1qs6bt732ztgp.dlg@40tude.net>
 <030cde76-7435-405d-9f12-ac7f730ecab8@googlegroups.com>
 <1f9q6vk5z2r3t$.1hayo9rmxfwu7$.dlg@40tude.net> <ju8atj$734$1@munin.nbi.dk>
 <wd9m63dfb4hn.1feik6xrauuel$.dlg@40tude.net> <juafd9$fa5$1@munin.nbi.dk>
 <1agfifqlayl3y.1bp09z5i37ewk$.dlg@40tude.net> <jucrlq$d2c$1@munin.nbi.dk>
 <1nnq1oprn6h4f.1s5myl3oupdds$.dlg@40tude.net> <jul1rf$3rn$1@munin.nbi.dk>
 <57ed1bca-b503-492c-a3b1-012369484e93@googlegroups.com>
 <e3lpckmcck22$.eqnl4sn38ezy$.dlg@40tude.net> <juq03a$aph$1@munin.nbi.dk>
 <1gt5njrqzprkt$.1f9deqqcwyyuq.dlg@40tude.net> <m2vchapt3w.fsf@nidhoggr.home>
 <1g6eygs4wyie8.x1sl1gap1gec$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <c2f946fc-c028-4869-a469-5f79aee11556@googlegroups.com>
 <16ft4hb6xzphu.z8f7urnw3xu0.dlg@40tude.net>
In-Reply-To: <16ft4hb6xzphu.z8f7urnw3xu0.dlg@40tude.net>
Message-ID: <50128262$0$6554$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net>
Organization: Arcor
NNTP-Posting-Date: 27 Jul 2012 13:58:27 CEST
NNTP-Posting-Host: 28fb978c.newsspool4.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=49Z38NjCQie]l@YUW5NBkn4IUK<Cl32<a4Fo<]lROoRa8kF<OcfhCOknJn2oIPGFQbnc\616M64>jLh>_cHTX3jmC8`S1XMmlMa
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: 2012-07-27T13:58:27+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 27.07.12 12:32, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote:
> I don't even know the purpose of limited
> aggregates


For limited aggregates I'd suggest that it is good to have
statically initialized, read-only objects. For example,
deferred constants that are initialized, from static values,
in the private part of a package.  These limited
objects could be stored in ROM, yet have primitive subprograms
associated with them as (more or less) usual.