From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,103803355c3db607 X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Received: by 10.68.227.67 with SMTP id ry3mr394880pbc.8.1343314411126; Thu, 26 Jul 2012 07:53:31 -0700 (PDT) Path: b9ni64917635pbl.0!nntp.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border4.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!novia!feeder3.cambriumusenet.nl!feeder1.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!94.232.116.11.MISMATCH!feed.xsnews.nl!border-1.ams.xsnews.nl!newsfeed.straub-nv.de!news.swapon.de!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder2.enfer-du-nord.net!usenet-fr.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder2-2.proxad.net!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool3.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 07:42:05 +0200 From: Georg Bauhaus User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120614 Thunderbird/13.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: GNAT (GCC) Profile Guided Compilation References: <520bdc39-6004-4142-a227-facf14ebb0e8@googlegroups.com> <4ff08cb2$0$6575$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net> <4ff1d731$0$6582$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net> <4ff41d38$0$6577$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net> <26b778c4-5abc-4fbf-94b0-888c2ce71831@googlegroups.com> <4ff43956$0$6576$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net> <2dba1140-4f28-4fb8-ace4-2c10f3a02313@googlegroups.com> <505460ad-495d-41b4-a88f-e95eb99a6be3@googlegroups.com> <50068967$0$9507$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net> In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <50079e21$0$9502$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net> Organization: Arcor NNTP-Posting-Date: 19 Jul 2012 07:41:53 CEST NNTP-Posting-Host: 8dcae0a3.newsspool1.arcor-online.net X-Trace: DXC=LEic==]BZ:afN4Fo<]lROoRAnkgeX?EC@@@C[<4Pd9AVHBPCY\c7>ejVHk On 18.07.12 19:36, Keean Schupke wrote: > I think if you use -O3 -gnatn (and pragma Inline(X)) the function will be inlined. Does it still make a difference then? It did. In particular, A_T_A_Conversion seemed to need -gnatN. The differences were small, in a range between .67s and .73s for 50_000_000 iterations, trying a number of combinations of switches. I haven't tried profile guided optimization, though.