From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,2f7ef46127892c41 X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Received: by 10.180.95.2 with SMTP id dg2mr558960wib.2.1343130706894; Tue, 24 Jul 2012 04:51:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.224.177.12 with SMTP id bg12mr9836692qab.0.1343130692218; Tue, 24 Jul 2012 04:51:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.66.72.165 with SMTP id e5mr355388pav.4.1343130692112; Tue, 24 Jul 2012 04:51:32 -0700 (PDT) Path: q11ni54747048wiw.1!nntp.google.com!volia.net!news2.volia.net!feed-A.news.volia.net!x2no14322546qaj.0!news-out.google.com!a15ni78873794qag.0!nntp.google.com!x2no14322536qaj.0!news-out.google.com!b9ni47268539pbl.0!nntp.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed.news.ucla.edu!news.snarked.org!news.glorb.com!news.tele.dk!feed118.news.tele.dk!dotsrc.org!filter.dotsrc.org!news.dotsrc.org!not-for-mail Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 08:00:03 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Thomas_L=F8cke?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120710 Thunderbird/13.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Little people supporting Ada, possibly through AdaCore? References: <12955589.960.1336138013614.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbbfk16> <5043095.1117.1336142172111.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbli11> <2d7fae9a-5be7-4011-a945-5ecd95684025@googlegroups.com> <949570cd-bdda-49ff-93c7-5189546adf7a@googlegroups.com> In-Reply-To: <949570cd-bdda-49ff-93c7-5189546adf7a@googlegroups.com> Message-ID: <5004ff62$0$293$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> Organization: SunSITE.dk - Supporting Open source NNTP-Posting-Host: 77.234.168.90 X-Trace: news.sunsite.dk DXC=F:]dmRFX`S[jXN@]UnT6J_YSB=nbEKnk[=0L68Rc\_c^3ZOKe3?:>XQcAE?;m5ccYS3>^Oo7SF On 07/17/2012 03:58 AM, Adrian Hoe wrote: > The JSON output that the example produced is perfectly valid JSON. My concern is human readable JSON. With the order of the objects not output according to the sequence of the input/creation makes the output very un-readable for human. Not good for debugging purpose though. From json.org: "An object is an unordered set of name/value pairs." So it is not the job of GNATCOLL.JSON to keep your JSON objects in any kind of order. :o) -- Thomas L�cke | thomas@12boo.net | http://12boo.net