From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,120a40ece2c29ff2
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Laurent.Guerby@enst-bretagne.fr (Laurent Guerby)
Subject: Re: PVM, MPI, Ada?
Date: 1996/02/21
Message-ID: <4xvil0oear.fsf@boole.enst-bretagne.fr>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 140401906
distribution: world
sender: guerby@boole.enst-bretagne.fr
references: <4gdbvk$81o@dfw.dfw.net>
content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
organization: Telecom Bretagne
mime-version: 1.0
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-02-21T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

David Weller writes
: 
: I recall reading somewhere a while ago that there was going to be a
: PVM binding available for Ada.  This looked like a good idea, but it
: seems that MPI is moving into PVM's spot as "Parallel Architecture du
: Jour".  Does anybody know if there is an MPI binding for Ada?  Does
: anybody else think both those standards are somewhat redundant with
: Ada 95's annexes?  Does anybody care? :-)

PVM and MPI are assembly languages compared to the distributed annex
(distribution/network "without the pain"). They can be used to build
the annex, they are not "redundant" ;-).

: 		    GNAT = GNAT is Not an Ada Translator

Hum, GNAT = the GNU Ada 95 compiler ;-) 

: ==Ada 95 Booch Components: www.ocsystems.com/booch or www.dfw.net/~dweller==

J - 8

--  Laurent Guerby, student at Telecom Bretagne (FRANCE), Team Ada
--  mailto:Laurent.Guerby@enst-bretagne.fr
--  http://www-eleves.enst-bretagne.fr/~guerby/
--  Try GNAT, the GNU Ada 95 compiler (ftp://cs.nyu.edu/pub/gnat)