From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,15890893c0618a8a X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Laurent.Guerby@enst-bretagne.fr (Laurent Guerby) Subject: Re: Ada naming conventions? Date: 1996/04/29 Message-ID: <4xohoavkcj.fsf@lagrange.enst-bretagne.fr>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 152109054 distribution: world sender: guerby@lagrange.enst-bretagne.fr references: <4m0fi2$225e@mule1.mindspring.com> content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII 17: 05:27 GMT organization: Telecom Bretagne mime-version: 1.0 newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1996-04-29T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Paul Williamson writes : I agree fully with Bob and Ken , SPC guide is a must have/must follow : guide to such things. : : In over 6 years of working in and around Ada, : I have found very few times this guide failed to : provide a terrific guide, it is well planned with the : rationale for each rule also well documented. A bit more on the usefullness of the AQ&S, all the rationales provided are a great deal of information, and not only for Ada. I think that the reading (or browsing, see AJPO site, the document itself is freely available) of the AQ&S should come really soon in the process of learning Ada, at least to give some good reference on portability/performance/comments, and as a guide on how to use the features of Ada 95. Completing the Lovelace tutorial plus some experience in programming are enough to have a useful reading of the Ada Quality & Style Guide. -- -- Laurent Guerby, student at Telecom Bretagne (France), Team Ada. -- "Use the Source, Luke. The Source will be with you, always (GPL)." -- http://www-eleves.enst-bretagne.fr/~guerby/ (GATO Project). -- Try GNAT, the GNU Ada 95 compiler (ftp://cs.nyu.edu/pub/gnat).