From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f7344,dbab47e756f4068e
X-Google-Attributes: gidf7344,public
X-Google-Thread: 103376,dbab47e756f4068e
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Charlie McCutcheon <cmccutcheon@begin.dec.com>
Subject: Re: DEC Ada V3.3
Date: 1996/08/27
Message-ID: <4vvosk$h1q@nntpd.lkg.dec.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 176846626
references: <321C3BC6.1897@dial.eunet.ch> <321D6756.3AA2@ubs.com>
 <Mats.Weber-2308961932520001@mlma27.elca-matrix.ch>
content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
organization: Digital Equipment Corporation
x-url: news:Mats.Weber-2308961932520001@mlma27.elca-matrix.ch
mime-version: 1.0
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.os.vms
x-mailer: Mozilla 1.12I (X11; I; OSF1 V4.0 alpha)
Date: 1996-08-27T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


>We also have problems with DEC Ada V3.3 (unexplained Contraint_Errors,
>unpredictable behavior, duplicate symbols on link of optimized code,
>access violations, etc.) and we are seriously considering going back to
>3.2.

I have not seen this sorts of problems reported with Ada V3.3.

If you have a Digital support contract, please report them, with instructions
for reproducing them.  We have customers running V3.3, and they appear to
be relatively happy...  ;-)

Charlie
DEC Ada