From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 14a4cc,7961088baf0e34d6 X-Google-Attributes: gid14a4cc,public X-Google-Thread: 153904,7961088baf0e34d6 X-Google-Attributes: gid153904,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,7961088baf0e34d6 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: rlove@neosoft.com (Robert B. Love ) Subject: Re: AIA Position on Ada Date: 1996/08/24 Message-ID: <4vnkll$mko@uuneo.neosoft.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 176232417 references: <321DA0F7.79D4@lmtas.lmco.com> <321E0811.B9D@lmtas.lmco.com> organization: NeoSoft, Inc. cc: KauffmanBB@lmtas.lmco.com newsgroups: lmtas.software.forum,lmco.software,comp.lang.ada Date: 1996-08-24T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In <321E0811.B9D@lmtas.lmco.com> "Byron B. Kauffman" wrote: > But on the brighter side, think of the money the company will be saving now > by not having to spend all those hours coming up with excuses to justify an > Ada waiver!!! Yeah, but what about a trade study to determine which language to use? How many manhours will this be? Or will it just be a xerox of the last trade study that concluded what the authors want? ---------------------------------------------------------------- Bob Love, rlove@neosoft.com (local) MIME & NeXT Mail OK rlove@raptor.rmnug.org (permanent) PGP key available ----------------------------------------------------------------