From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,INVALID_MSGID,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,74a56083ffbe573d
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: rgilbert@unconfigured.xvnews.domain (Bob Gilbert)
Subject: Re: Zoo question
Date: 1996/08/15
Message-ID: <4uvoi4$oi6@zeus.orl.mmc.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 174420113
references: <dewar.840110364@schonberg>
organization: The unconfigured xvnews people
reply-to: rgilbert@unconfigured.xvnews.domain
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-08-15T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


In article <dewar.840110364@schonberg>, dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) writes:
> LET'S CLEAN UP THE ANIMAL CAGES! :-)

{Thorough explanation of why sample would produce expected results, deleted}

> So, the mystery is, why is this a brain teaser for Ken. That must mean that
> he found it not working on some compiler. 

Or perhaps Ken just likes to throw out a bit of code that works,
imply that it doesn't, and see how badly some of us can embarrass
ourselves trying to explain why it might not work :-).

(Darn, I knew Ted's explanation about the constraint exception
not being guaranteed to occur inside the begin block sounded a
little suspect, but he just sounded so convincing.  I hate when
that happens).

-Bob