From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 109fba,baaf5f793d03d420
X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public
X-Google-Thread: fc89c,97188312486d4578
X-Google-Attributes: gidfc89c,public
X-Google-Thread: 1014db,6154de2e240de72a
X-Google-Attributes: gid1014db,public
X-Google-Thread: 103376,97188312486d4578
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Craig Franck <clfranck@worldnet.att.net>
Subject: Re: What's the best language to start with? [was: Re: Should I learn
 C or Pascal?]
Date: 1996/08/11
Message-ID: <4ujdus$7ph@mtinsc01-mgt.ops.worldnet.att.net>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 173444001
references: <01bb846c$e51df220$87ee6fce@timpent.airshields.com>
 <4ug4eh$qn8@zeus.orl.mmc.com> <01bb86f5$f7f8ae40$32ee6fce@timhome2>
content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
organization: AT&T WorldNet Services
mime-version: 1.0
newsgroups: comp.lang.c,comp.lang.c++,comp.unix.programmer,comp.lang.ada
x-mailer: Mozilla 1.22ATT (Windows; U; 16bit)
Date: 1996-08-11T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


"Tim Behrendsen" <tim@airshields.com> wrote:
>Bob Gilbert <rgilbert@unconfigured.xvnews.domain> wrote in article
>
>> I though assembly was an abstraction of the raw instruction set, not
>> exactly the raw instruction set.  After all, the assembler allows one
>> to abstract memory locations by assigning names or labels to them, it 
>> abstracts the instructions by assigning shorthand pneumonics to them, 
>> many allow the abstraction of code fragments which might perform some
>> higher level function by allowing the programmer to implement them as
>> macros, etc.
>
>Well, technically you're right but there is a one-to-one
>correspondance between assembly mnemonics and machine language,
>so there is no practical difference between the two, as far
>as understanding the machine.
>

Realy? Why stop there? With RISC microprocessors there is almost
a one to one correspondance between instructions and hardware, but
with CISC there is not. There are little programs written in 
microcode that run when machine language instructions are executed.
Linked lists were primatives to the old VAX archetecture. And why 
stop there, to really understand computers you need to understand 
digital electronics. NAND gates, flip flops, inverters, ect. To
understand them you need a background in electronics. You need
to understand how transistors work. My point to all this is you
reach a point of diminishing return. Starting a class on algorithms
with a discusion of Ohms law is ridiculous. Needing to know how
to move values into registers rather than just writing a = b + c;
is not as bad, but its still not needed. 


-- 

Craig
-----
clfranck@worldnet.att.net
Manchester, NH
There are no electrons...