From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f43e6,5ac12f5a60b1bfe X-Google-Attributes: gidf43e6,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,5ac12f5a60b1bfe X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: 101deb,f96f757d5586710a X-Google-Attributes: gid101deb,public From: progers@acm.org (Pat Rogers) Subject: Re: Ariane 5 - not an exception? Date: 1996/08/09 Message-ID: <4ufgo1$4eo@uuneo.neosoft.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 173142743 references: <31FE35BC.1A0D@sanders.lockheed.com> <4totv7$o9f@goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au> <32065615.77C7@sanders.lockheed.com> <4u69g9$157k@news.ccit.arizona.edu> <320A288E.725B@sanders.lockheed.com> organization: NeoSoft, Inc. reply-to: Pat Rogers progers@acm.org newsgroups: comp.software-eng,comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.pl1 Date: 1996-08-09T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In <320A288E.725B@sanders.lockheed.com>, Steve O'Neill writes: >Frank Manning wrote: [snip] >> Like Steve says, you can't fault developers who implement the >> requirements they're given, especially if the developers have no >> specialized training in aerospace engineering. The converse is also >> true -- what do you do about aero engineers (or mechanical/electrical/ >> etc.) who have little training in -- forgive me -- software >> engineering? How do you bridge the gulf? > >Easy, hire me, I've got a BS in Aero and about 15 years experience in the >analysis and development of related real-time systems. > >Sorry, I couldn't resist. ;) OK -- I'll hire you, but you'll have to move to Houston.... :) pat --------------- Patrick Rogers progers@acm.org