From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,608e018aa2dff3f7,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: cs-defense-ceo@calva.net (Patrice Saintonge)
Subject: GNAT vs other compilers
Date: 1996/08/06
Message-ID: <4u7q2j$2d9@midgard.calvacom.fr>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 172469889
organization: cs - defense
content-type: Text/Plain; charset=US-ASCII
mime-version: 1.0
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-08-06T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Hello !

I'm currently trying to convince my boss that GNU tools are worth being 
used, compared to other often expensive proprietary tools.

This is why i'm looking for comparative evaluations of the GNAT 
compiler vs the other compilers in the hood.

Many thanks in advance.

Patrice Saintonge.
cs-defense-ceo@calva.net