From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 101deb,87f6968ed41c9df1 X-Google-Attributes: gid101deb,public X-Google-Thread: f43e6,5ac12f5a60b1bfe X-Google-Attributes: gidf43e6,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,5ac12f5a60b1bfe X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: U32872@uic.edu Subject: Re: Multiple reasons for failure of Ariane 5 (was: Re: Ariane 5 - not an exception?) Date: 1996/08/06 Message-ID: <4u6723$kp2@piglet.cc.uic.edu>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 172334243 references: <4ta0iu$kks@goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au> <4u538f$9q6@hacgate2.hac.com> organization: University of Illinois at Chicago reply-to: GYanoa@uic.edu newsgroups: comp.software-eng,comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.pl1 Date: 1996-08-06T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In <4u538f$9q6@hacgate2.hac.com>, ddavenpo@redwood.hac.com (Darren C Davenport) writes: >I don't think any language endows a programmer with more intelligence. > >Darren That is certainly true but, I think, PL/1 attracts programmers who are already well endowed with intelligence.