From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,91dae7f46f606507 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: dweller@dfw.net (David Weller) Subject: Re: GNAT link error Date: 1996/08/01 Message-ID: <4tqtm2$p6r@dfw.dfw.net>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 171442711 references: <1996Jul30.105853.24820@hrbicf> <19960801.113724.084@satcom.whit.org> organization: DFWNet -- Public Internet Access newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1996-08-01T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <19960801.113724.084@satcom.whit.org>, Robert Dunn wrote: > The error(s) I am getting now are traced back to the line where the >package declaration occurs in the standard packages. > Perhaps we have something set up wrong here. Perhaps this is I'd say that is accurate. One dire warning: If you're "officially" licensed to use SGI's Ada 95 product, don't EVER mix the public release of GNAT with SGI's release. It took me a while to straighten that mess out on my system :-) >related to your problems. Perhaps we will eventually get our manuals >from SGI. (yea, right, took 3 weeks to get the right s/w versions) > Well, you can always read the manuals from http://www.sgi.com/Technology/TechPubs/ (Click on "Search" and use "GNAT" as the search keyword) I don't understand why it took so long anyway -- we get updates almost weekly via ftp :-) -- Visit the Ada 95 Booch Components Homepage: www.ocsystems.com/booch This is not your father's Ada -- lglwww.epfl.ch/Ada