From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 1014db,6154de2e240de72a
X-Google-Attributes: gid1014db,public
X-Google-Thread: 101deb,ec5e801e70a0a8f1
X-Google-Attributes: gid101deb,public
X-Google-Thread: 103376,ec5e801e70a0a8f1
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Thread: 109fba,ec5e801e70a0a8f1
X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public
From: rav@goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au (++           robin)
Subject: Re: Should I learn C or Pascal?
Date: 1996/08/01
Message-ID: <4tp7fc$8fp@goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 171361863
references: <sperlman-0507961717550001@p121.ezo.net>
 <4t6hrs$kid@goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au> <31FD4510.4150@voyager.co.nz>
 <4tkc4n$569@sjx-ixn5.ix.netcom.com>
organization: Comp Sci, RMIT, Melbourne, Australia
newsgroups: comp.lang.c,comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.pl1
nntp-posting-user: rav
Date: 1996-08-01T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


	robt2@ix.netcom.com(Rob(t.) Brannan) writes:

	>As a first language Pascal is the way to go for many reasons.

	>C is very complicated as a first language (libraries,pointers,numerous
	>low level routines), not to mention some of the errors that you will
	>encounter are not exactly well covered in any book.

	>As a newbie , remember trying to figure out whats wrong when an
	>included file or library was just left out!

---Then use PL/I.  That just can't happen!

PL/I is an excellent first language.  And the
output is even *easier* to do than Pascal or C.

BTW, one of the advantages of PL/I for a beginner
is the excellent diagnstic messages not only at run time,
but also at compile time.