From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,9274a920d35ff1f6
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: wpritche@osf1.gmu.edu (William W Pritchett)
Subject: Re: Sanity breaks out at last
Date: 1996/07/29
Message-ID: <4tisho$p65@portal.gmu.edu>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 170995648
references: <BdceaIANXM+xEwtR@ntxbow.demon.co.uk> <1996Jul29.101733.1@eisner>
content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
organization: George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia, USA
mime-version: 1.0
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-07-29T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Check out Green Hills, Tartan, Rational, Thomson and/or DDC-I.  They all target the 68K family.

Larry Kilgallen (kilgallen@eisner.decus.org) wrote:
: In article <BdceaIANXM+xEwtR@ntxbow.demon.co.uk>, ntxbow <ntxbow@ntxbow.demon.co.uk> writes:
: > we're finally thinking of giving Intel processors the heave ho.
: > 
: > Does anyone know of Ada compilers for non-intel embedded evironments, ie
: > motorola and ARM processors?
: > 
: > I've used the XD ada compiler on 68000s before now but it's very pricey.

: Does everybody need the XD Ada compiler ?

: I would think one of the benefits of Ada would be that coding could
: be done on any platform, along with a lot of the testing.

: Larry Kilgallen