From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,c9ae958322362a4d
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: mfeldman@seas.gwu.edu (Michael Feldman)
Subject: Re: Ada Common Environment (ACE)
Date: 1996/07/23
Message-ID: <4t4702$7us@felix.seas.gwu.edu>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 169846969
references: <960722142538_73313.2671_FHM39-3@CompuServe.COM>
organization: George Washington University
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-07-23T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


In article <960722142538_73313.2671_FHM39-3@CompuServe.COM>,
Bob Mathis  <73313.2671@COMPUSERVE.COM> wrote:

>The Ada industry wants to respond in a timely manner and that's what ACE
>is about. Making this part of the ISO standard is a different issue. Over
>the 14 years I've been involved with ISO, their approach to interpreting,
>adding to, or changing standards has been evolving. I think there will be
>even larger changes in the next couple of years.

This all sounds very good. I really hope the Ada industry really does
respond in a timely manner; Ada has been overtaken by events so many
times... I keep hoping it won't happen again.

Mike Feldman