From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,ac06cbb94859faf5 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: rlk@nubuddy (Bob Kitzberger) Subject: Re: Ada Timing Analysis Date: 1996/07/23 Message-ID: <4t31v0$dfn@rational.rational.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 170338197 references: <4t0iej$2c9@explorer.csc.com> organization: Rational Software Corporation newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1996-07-23T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Bob McIntire (bmcintir@csc.com) wrote: : My question is, does any one have a reasonable number for the ratio of Ada : source to machine language statements?? That's highly dependent on the CPU architecture, the compiler, and any optimizations selected. I suggest that you contact your vendor (or potential vendors) for assistance. Perhaps a small sample program can be put through the paces to come up with the baseline metrics you need. -- Bob Kitzberger Rational Software Corporation rlk@rational.com http://www.rational.com http://www.rational.com/pst/products/testmate.html