From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,ac06cbb94859faf5
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: brashear@ns1.sw-eng.falls-church.va.us (Philip Brashear)
Subject: Re: Ada Timing Analysis
Date: 1996/07/23
Message-ID: <4t2eu6$9a6@ns1.sw-eng.falls-church.va.us>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 169635407
references: <4t0iej$2c9@explorer.csc.com>
organization: None
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-07-23T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


In article <4t0iej$2c9@explorer.csc.com>,
Bob McIntire <bmcintir@csc.com> wrote:
>
>My question is, does any one have a reasonable number for the ratio of Ada 
>source to machine language statements??


This ratio varies tremendously with the kind of statements and the particular
compiler.  The Ada Compiler Evaluation System (ACES) produces massive amounts
of data regarding code expansion.

See http://sw-eng.falls-church.va.us/adaic/testing/aces

or contact me directly.

Phil Brashear
CTA INCORPORATED
brashear@sw-eng.falls-church.va.us
brashear.cta@juno.com
(513) 258-0831