From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,ac06cbb94859faf5,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: bmcintir@csc.com (Bob McIntire)
Subject: Ada Timing Analysis
Date: 1996/07/22
Message-ID: <4t0iej$2c9@explorer.csc.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 169528221
organization: Computer Sciences Corp.
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-07-22T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Our office is preparing a proposal in which we are required to estimate the 
amount of CPU time the processes will take in the finished application.  We 
have done an estimate of the number of lines of Ada code we think the 
application will require.  Now, we are trying to "translate" that number to 
lines of generic machine language code.  From that, using spec marks, we can 
determine how much of the CPU will be used by each process. 

My question is, does any one have a reasonable number for the ratio of Ada 
source to machine language statements??

Bob McIntire
bmcintir@csc.com
Computer Sciences Corp.