From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,96ed71365ee11846
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: mfeldman@seas.gwu.edu (Michael Feldman)
Subject: Re: Limitations of Ada
Date: 1996/07/20
Message-ID: <4ss8bf$33o@felix.seas.gwu.edu>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 169262129
references: <31EF79A3.812@freenet.scri.fsu.edu>
organization: George Washington University
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-07-20T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


In article <31EF79A3.812@freenet.scri.fsu.edu>,
The Quelisher  <kendal@freenet.scri.fsu.edu> wrote:
>With all this discussion about programming different things ins Ada, I 
>got to thinking......Just what are the limitations of the language? I 
>mean, is it versitile enough to program a Windows program then turn right 
>back around and make a kernel?

Yes. It's as versatile as any other language; it is general-purpose.
I often wonder why anyone would think otherwise?

>Just letting curiosity get the better of me...

Why not satisfy that curiosity by giving it a try?

Mike Feldman