From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,280de4248570bb72
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!news2.volia.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: "Alex R. Mosteo" <devnull@mailinator.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Profiler?
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 17:34:32 +0100
Message-ID: <4sjccvF1063beU1@mid.individual.net>
References: <1164207144.438846.201330@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com>
 <7o7e34-hcm.ln1@newserver.thecreems.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
X-Trace: individual.net PjtUuy3h+gant6wUlxKsZQHREYE4Y3MsZf2H2EbCpOuk8f3T4=
User-Agent: KNode/0.10.4
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:7648
Date: 2006-11-22T17:34:32+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Jeffrey Creem wrote:

> Harald Korneliussen wrote:
>> Does anyone know of a good profiler for programs written in Ada?

> If I try to make an assumption (and I could get this wrong) and assume
> by Ada you mean GNAT and then assume that perhaps you mean Linux I can
> say that gprof is actually an "ok" profiler. It is not great but it gets
> the job done.

Based in that same assumption, I've used successfully valgrind and
kcachegrind with nice results, also for multitasking programs. Oprofile was
in my list of things to look at that I never reached.