From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,9ce5fb49dc74582f X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: "Alex R. Mosteo" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: generic question Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 18:35:49 +0100 Message-ID: <4sgrjtFvjeniU1@mid.individual.net> References: <1163959439.299036.129940@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com> <87mz6nnt4v.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org> <20061119202320.19149a2f@cube.tz.axivion.com> <4560D5BE.5060508@obry.net> <1164059458.442430.110710@j44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <4562a51a$0$27404$ba4acef3@news.orange.fr> <45633396.10704@obry.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Trace: individual.net yYJhpK/fddT0XGTN63LGwg5BbaQ/B+R4010nfqej9c0KTc6kQ= User-Agent: KNode/0.10.4 Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:7616 Date: 2006-11-21T18:35:49+01:00 List-Id: Lutz Donnerhacke wrote: > * Pascal Obry wrote: >> I find anonymous access type less useful this way... Why even bother >> with them then ? > > Because you can derive pointers without allocation. > E.g. self references of limited types. But, I'd say, this already was doable without named access types with access discriminants.