From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,99ab4bb580fc34cd X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: kenner@lab.ultra.nyu.edu (Richard Kenner) Subject: Re: Q: access to subprogram Date: 1996/07/16 Message-ID: <4sfu7v$631@news.nyu.edu>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 168538777 references: <4sbtc5$uej@news.nyu.edu> <4sdt1i$nqa@mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU> organization: New York University Ultracomputer Research Lab newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1996-07-16T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <4sdt1i$nqa@mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU> fjh@mundook.cs.mu.OZ.AU (Fergus Henderson) writes: >Well, there's still going to be a lot of Pentiums out there for quite >some time -- I wouldn't call the issue entirely moot yet. I would because the issue is optimization, not functionality. The people who want every last cycle of performance are now going to be the ones who use a P6, not a Pentium.