From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,e29c511c2b08561c
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: rlk@rational.com (Bob Kitzberger)
Subject: Re: Is the "Ada mandate" being reconsidered?
Date: 1996/07/08
Message-ID: <4rrrvg$j9b@rational.rational.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 167398029
references: <9606212019.AA11075@eight-ball>
 <gwinn-2506961919470001@smc19.ed.ray.com> <4qqc4s$flv@felix.seas.gwu.edu>
 <gwinn-2706961648080001@smc19.ed.ray.com> <nhbui2uhwc.fsf@paralysys>
 <gwinn-0307962011210001@smc19.ed.ray.com>
organization: Rational Software Corporation
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-07-08T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Joe Gwinn (gwinn@res.ray.com) wrote:

: That said, on (for instance) FAA jobs, where the allowed languages now
: range all the way from ANSI C to C++  [...]

This seems to imply that Ada is not 'allowed' on FAA projects.
I'm having a hard time believing that's true...

--
Bob Kitzberger	      Rational Software Corporation       rlk@rational.com
http://www.rational.com http://www.rational.com/pst/products/testmate.html