From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,beaecb10ecefd924
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: ron@cs.tamu.edu (Ron J Theriault)
Subject: Re: Ada/Socket binding standardization
Date: 1996/07/08
Message-ID: <4rrih2$56o@news.tamu.edu>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 167225406
sender: ron@slx0 (Ron J Theriault)
references: <4rc4e0$hfm@salyko.cube.net>
organization: Texas A&M Computer Science Department, College Station, TX
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-07-08T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


In article <4rc4e0$hfm@salyko.cube.net>, okellogg@cube.net (Oliver Kellogg) writes:
|> I recently heard that there is an effort by POSIX to standardize the Ada
|> binding to Berkeley sockets. Are there any draft package specs
|> available? Where do I get more information?

Yes, there is a mailing list: posix-ada-net, and also
a www site where the draft spec, P1003.5c, is available:
http://www.pasc.org.

-- 
Ron Theriault              |   
CS Department              |   In a democracy, you only have to fool
Texas A&M Univ.            |   most of the people, most of the time.
ron@cs.tamu.edu            |