From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,325c54deb91283fd X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-04-29 20:22:14 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!paloalto-snf1.gtei.net!news.gtei.net!news.compaq.com!nntp-relay.ihug.net!ihug.co.nz!west.cox.net!cox.net!small1.nntp.aus1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nntp3.aus1.giganews.com!nntp.gbronline.com!news.gbronline.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 22:22:13 -0500 Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 22:22:34 -0500 From: Wesley Groleau Reply-To: wesgroleau@despammed.com Organization: Ain't no organization here! User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021130 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, es-mx, pt-br, fr-ca MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada in Iraq References: <155qhxofl6d88$.dlg@parsec.no-spoon.de> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <4rWdnQYvvtn73DKjXTWcqA@gbronline.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 216.117.18.22 X-Trace: sv3-tPM2hFMaQ65/4RF7hkFMWmDIve96unhnxfS7lccDQDqYjT+9cm4DQePnhomyr/r/SCCUmCCUW4KCVTH!hpxACM+jtfWc8VseyDa2PVptub/lYtY5QO5HyPShy/1tAwR2EomBXvW59/3Zwk80bcHnFc4WjVNJ!wAIo X-Complaints-To: abuse@gbronline.com X-DMCA-Complaints-To: abuse@gbronline.com X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.1 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:36752 Date: 2003-04-29T22:22:34-05:00 List-Id: Georg Bauhaus wrote: > Wesley Groleau wrote: > : > : - (A.multiply(A)).add (B.multiply(B)) instead of > : A * A + B * B > > You are caught in your Ada habits :-) > > - (A.times(A)).plus (B.times(B)) > > Quite readable, isn't it? No.