From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,e29c511c2b08561c
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: ncohen@watson.ibm.com (Norman H. Cohen)
Subject: Re: Is the "Ada mandate" being reconsidered?
Date: 1996/07/01
Message-ID: <4r8rfp$1h4q@watnews1.watson.ibm.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 163109890
distribution: world
references: <9606212019.AA11075@eight-ball>
 <gwinn-2506961919470001@smc19.ed.ray.com> <4qqc4s$flv@felix.seas.gwu.edu>
 <gwinn-2706961648080001@smc19.ed.ray.com> <dewar.836078493@schonberg>
organization: IBM T.J. Watson Research Center
reply-to: ncohen@watson.ibm.com
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-07-01T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


In article <dewar.836078493@schonberg>, dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) writes: 

|> As far as the front end goes, almost all problems show up in an obvious
|> way, e.g. as an internally detected error, rather than as something
|> strange happening -- there are of course exceptions, but not many.

This is a clever play on words, whether or not it was intended as such!

--
Norman H. Cohen    ncohen@watson.ibm.com