From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,e29c511c2b08561c X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: rlk@rational.com (Bob Kitzberger) Subject: Re: Is the "Ada mandate" being reconsidered? Date: 1996/06/25 Message-ID: <4qovlp$n29@rational.rational.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 162083674 references: <4mq7mg$8hs@jake.probe.net> <4peu0v$rfq@news15.erols.com> <1996Jun10.114827.26046@relay.nswc.navy.mil> <4pk5sm$i7k@gde.GDEsystems.COM> <31BEC408.2781E494@escmail.orl.mmc.com> <4ppb89$gbq@gde.GDEsystems.COM> organization: Rational Software Corporation newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1996-06-25T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: [I hope my attribution line is correct...] In article <4ppb89$gbq@gde.GDEsystems.COM>, Michael Levasseur wrote: > "Rational". From conversations with "Rational" what they're working > on is their C++ compiler. I'm not sure who you talked to at Rational, but this is very misleading. Yes, we are working on our C++ compiler. And our Ada 83 and Ada 95 compilers, and our kernel, and our OOD tools, and our CMVC tools, and our test automation tools, and our process automation tools, and our document automation tools, and our safety-critical tools ... We believe that a comprehensive toolset, not only a compiler, is required to build any significant application. -- Bob Kitzberger Rational Software Corporation rlk@rational.com http://www.rational.com http://www.rational.com/pst/products/testmate.html