From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,e283979660f903f
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Waltersr@usa.pipeline.com(Walter B. Hollman Sr.)
Subject: Re: GNAT 301a with Win95
Date: 1996/06/25
Message-ID: <4qnfuk$hvf@news1.t1.usa.pipeline.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 161964022
references: <c76_9606211625@mailer.castle.riga.lv>
x-pipeuser: Waltersr
x-pipehub: usa.pipeline.com
organization: Pipeline USA
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
x-pipegcos: (Walter B. Hollman Sr.)
Date: 1996-06-25T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


On Jun 21, 1996 11:43:00 in article <GNAT 301a with Win95>,
'Vadim.Epmak@p66.f79.n5100.z2.fidonet.org (Vadim Epmak)' wrote: 
 
 
>Hello Theodore! 
> 
>20 Jun 96, Theodore E. Dennison writes to All: 
> 
>TED> Gnat is an Ada (95) compiler. If your "University account" is an Ada
83 
>TED> compiler, then there is no guarantee that code from one will compile
with 
>TED> the other without errors. They are two (slightly) different
languages. 
> 
>How about -gnat83 option ? 8) 
> 
>With Best Wishes, Vadim 
>21 Jun 96, 14:42 
-- 
Works for me!  From  DOS to NT no problem 
Walter B. Hollman Sr