From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,c239006be68d86aa
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: pontius@twonky.btv.ibm.com (Dale Pontius)
Subject: Re: GNAT on Win 95
Date: 1996/06/12
Message-ID: <4pmddf$16t2@mdnews.btv.ibm.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 159821710
references: <9606101448.AA26858@eight-ball>
organization: IBM Microelectronics Division
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-06-12T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


In article <9606101448.AA26858@eight-ball>,
        Bob Crispen <revbob@EIGHT-BALL.HV.BOEING.COM> writes:
>progers@ACM.ORG sez:
>-----
>While I'm sort of on the same topic, I hope the relevant folks are
>paying attention to the Win32 API that's in the process of coming
>out, I believe through the Cygnus GnuWin32 folks.  There's an opportunity
>for some synergy here, I believe.  I apologize for not knowing the
>name of the author; this represents a tremendous amount of work.
>-----
How does GNUWin32 compare/relate to WINE?

This is the first I've heard of it. So far I'd heard of WINE and
Willow, and various Public Windows proposals.

Dale Pontius
(NOT speaking for IBM)