From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f891f,9d58048b8113c00f
X-Google-Attributes: gidf891f,public
X-Google-Thread: 103376,2e71cf22768a124d
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Thread: 1014db,9d58048b8113c00f
X-Google-Attributes: gid1014db,public
X-Google-Thread: 10cc59,9d58048b8113c00f
X-Google-Attributes: gid10cc59,public
From: rav@goanna.cs.rmit.EDU.AU (++           robin)
Subject: Re: next "big" language?? (disagree)
Date: 1996/06/12
Message-ID: <4plb1g$da2@goanna.cs.rmit.EDU.AU>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 159713841
references: <4pj711$enp@goanna.cs.rmit.EDU.AU>
 <4pk88b$hfs@btmpjg.god.bel.alcatel.be>
organization: Comp Sci, RMIT, Melbourne, Australia
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.pascal,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.misc
nntp-posting-user: rav
Date: 1996-06-12T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


	ian@rsd.bel.alcatel.be (Ian Ward) writes:

	>Here is, of course, a case where myself and 
	>Robin have failed to notice vital information 
	>in text with which we were presented, I made 
	>the wrong conclusion on what Peter, and hence
	>Robin was talking about, (and mispelt, in the
	>heat of typing "replied".) Robin presumably also
	>in the heat of typing, mispelt "Belgium".

---What?  You made another mistake.  You're attributing
to me what another writer wrote, or you imagined it.

Perhaps you should now read what you wrote:  "Faults
like this happen every day . . ."

	">Faults like this happen every day when reading
	>requirements, and inevitably, now and again,
	>element 51, the 'last' element, of a 15 number
	>array is indexed, because someone was not
	>correctly assimilating the text in front of 
	>their eyes."