From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fac41,af40e09e753872c X-Google-Attributes: gidfac41,public X-Google-Thread: 109fba,f292779560fb8442 X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public X-Google-Thread: 1014db,30e368bdb3310fe5 X-Google-Attributes: gid1014db,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,30e368bdb3310fe5 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: 1008e3,30e368bdb3310fe5 X-Google-Attributes: gid1008e3,public X-Google-Thread: 10db24,30e368bdb3310fe5 X-Google-Attributes: gid10db24,public X-Google-Thread: f8c65,30e368bdb3310fe5 X-Google-Attributes: gidf8c65,public From: z007400b@bcfreenet.seflin.lib.fl.us (Ralph Silverman) Subject: Re: Hungarian notation Date: 1996/06/11 Message-ID: <4pk91s$48t@nntp.seflin.lib.fl.us>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 159655307 references: <31999F43.41C67EA6@scn.de> <4p5qsj$f2v@goanna.cs.rmit.EDU.AU> <4p9cia$9v3@nntp.seflin.lib.fl.us> <4pioot$kae@goanna.cs.rmit.EDU.AU> <4pk29i$nhj@tpd.dsccc.com> followup-to: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.modula3,comp.lang.modula2,comp.edu,comp.lang.eiffel organization: SEFLIN Free-Net - Broward newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.modula3,comp.lang.modula2,comp.edu,comp.lang.eiffel Date: 1996-06-11T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Kevin Cline (kcline@sun132.spd.dsccc.com) wrote: : In article <4pioot$kae@goanna.cs.rmit.EDU.AU>, : Richard A. O'Keefe wrote: : >If it wasn't covered by privacy regulations, I would try some of our : >2nd-year student code on you. It is clear Mr Silverman has no idea : >at all what student code can look like. : Actually, I think Mr. Silverman knows exactly what student code looks like: : It looks a lot like professional code. Or should I say that a lot of : professionally written code looks like 2nd-year student code? : Maybe we should have a contest to find the worst examples of professionally : produced C++ code? : -- : Kevin Cline -- ************begin r.s. response************** a program that works has, in this, taken on a life of its own that places it, in a way, outside the hands of its creator... perhaps it would be possible to develop a study of software independent of the intentions and personality of the creator of the software...which focuses on its characteristics as software! in such an impersonal study of software...preference might be given to avoidance of evaluation of provenance, comments and the like! objective, impersonal evaluation of software is largely attainable and might have real uses! ************end r.s. response**************** Ralph Silverman z007400b@bcfreenet.seflin.lib.fl.us