From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,eb3d914c57efebd3
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Mark Fisher <mark.fisher@gecm.com>
Subject: Re: Tasking
Date: 1996/06/07
Message-ID: <4p9dm2$858@gcsin3.geccs.gecm.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 158962758
references: <tat115.4.31B58EBB@psu.edu>
content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
organization: GEC-Marconi
x-url: news:tat115.4.31B58EBB@psu.edu
mime-version: 1.0
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
x-mailer: Mozilla 1.12 (X11; I; SunOS 4.1.3 sun4m)
Date: 1996-06-07T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


It can work either way...

The procedure making the call to the entry point
will be suspend execution until the task reaches the
accept statement.

If the task reaches the accept statement first,
it will block (suspend) until the procedure makes
the entry call. 

simple when you know ...

Mark