From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,6426898aedaa5880 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!nerim.net!oleane.net!oleane!hunter.axlog.fr!nobody From: Jean-Pierre Rosen Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Pragma for conditional compilation? (Ada 2005 vs. 95) Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 16:06:20 +0200 Organization: Adalog Message-ID: <4p1jdf.ssa.ln@hunter.axlog.fr> References: <1190879769.361848.188220@22g2000hsm.googlegroups.com> <1190929570.915553.284000@19g2000hsx.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: mailhost.axlog.fr Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: s1.news.oleane.net 1190991671 26936 195.25.228.57 (28 Sep 2007 15:01:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@oleane.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 15:01:11 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728) In-Reply-To: Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:2188 Date: 2007-09-28T16:06:20+02:00 List-Id: Jeffrey Creem a �crit : > I am not saying conditional compilation is the real answer, but pointing > to something that is outside the language definition as the answer is > somewhat of a cop out. Library package renaming is a way to achieve the same effect without resorting to CM. -- --------------------------------------------------------- J-P. Rosen (rosen@adalog.fr) Visit Adalog's web site at http://www.adalog.fr