From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,bd1a17edc1ccb2d6
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: david.c.hoos.sr@ada95.com (David C. Hoos, Sr.)
Subject: Re: Aggregate assignment problem with gnat under irix
Date: 1996/06/02
Message-ID: <4orssa$1ou@polo.iquest.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 158036064
distribution: world
references: <Pine.SGI.3.93.960531171236.29298A-100000@einstein.ph.utexas.edu>
organization: Ada 95 Press, Inc.
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-06-02T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Ullar Kask <ullar@einstein.ph.utexas.edu> wrote:

>Hello,

>  I am doing numerical simulations using Ada and encoutered a problem with
>aggregate assignment. The same type of statement, viz.,
.
.
.

>Has the STORAGE_ERROR raised in the task body (under irix) something to do
>with the size of the task stack? How it happens that such an aggregate
>assignment is possible outside a task body but fails inside?

Yes, I believe it does.  I don't know what the default task stack size
is for gnat, but on other compilers I have used it is as low as 10Kb.

The solution is to use the pragma Storage_Size (<integer-expression>)
inside the task declaration.

David C. Hoos, Sr.
http://www.ada95.com
http://www.dbhwww.com