From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10db24,12f4d07c572005e3 X-Google-Attributes: gid10db24,public X-Google-Thread: ff6c8,12f4d07c572005e3 X-Google-Attributes: gidff6c8,public X-Google-Thread: f43e6,12f4d07c572005e3 X-Google-Attributes: gidf43e6,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,12f4d07c572005e3 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: 1108a1,12f4d07c572005e3 X-Google-Attributes: gid1108a1,public From: bnm@indica.bbt.com (Brian N. Miller) Subject: Re: Java Risks (Was: Ada News Brief - 96-05-24 Date: 1996/05/31 Message-ID: <4omoh4$k0f@ansible.bbt.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 157721866 distribution: world sender: bnm@indica (Brian N. Miller) references: <4o56db$p66@ns1.sw-eng.falls-church.va.us> organization: BroadBand Technologies, RTP NC reply-to: bnm@bbt.com newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.sw.components,comp.object,comp.software-eng,comp.edu Date: 1996-05-31T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article , Richard Riehle writes: | | Java is BASIC for the next century. Now that's .sig worthy! | One of the problems with C++ is that it is evolving | beyond Stroustop's original vision into a collection of features in | which seem to be on a collsion course with each other. A disbelieve that C++ is evolving awkwardly. Is there a publication which claims so? Or is this 2-bit usenet opinion? ;')