From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,59dddae4a1f01e1a
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Darren C Davenport <ddavenpo@redwood.dn.hac.com>
Subject: Re: Need help with PowerPC/Ada and realtime tasking
Date: 1996/05/27
Message-ID: <4och4o$jdc@hacgate2.hac.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 157104376
references: <d-struble.107.001A95C3@ti.com> <1026696wnr@diphi.demon.co.uk>
 <Pine.GSO.3.92.960521204245.17309A-100000@nunic.nu.edu>
 <122916091wnr@diphi.demon.co.uk>
content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
organization: Hughes Aircraft Company
x-url: news:122916091wnr@diphi.demon.co.uk
mime-version: 1.0
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
x-mailer: Mozilla 1.12 (X11; U; SunOS 4.1.3 sun4c)
Date: 1996-05-27T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


JP Thornley <jpt@diphi.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>I was beginning to wonder whether I was the only reader of cla still 
>using Ada 83 until there were some recent posts from others in the same 
>situation in another thread.  To put my situation more clearly, there is 
>one safety-critical system going into system design later this year, 
>first trails to be run in 1998 and delivery to the customer in 2000 
>onwards - this system will use Ada 83 as the Ada 95 compilers won't be 
>usable in that timescale.
>
>Phil Thornley


Doesn't OC systems sell an Ada95 compiler for the PowerPC that's been
validated?
Seems like you ought to check out what the vendors provide before saying
that there won't be any Ada95 compilers in that timescale.

Darren