From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,66383f4b94d281e6 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: James E. Hopper Subject: Re: Ada-95 Success Stories Date: 1996/05/24 Message-ID: <4o3d6d$bua@news.erinet.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 156435865 distribution: world references: <4nv2ts$n8k@ns1.sw-eng.falls-church.va.us> <4nvakf$ljo@uuneo.neosoft.com> <4nvi1u$sju@news.erinet.com> <31a4eb29.1625999@news.cais.com> content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 x-xxmessage-id: organization: Personal mime-version: 1.0 newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1996-05-24T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <31a4eb29.1625999@news.cais.com> Mark Doernhoefer, mdoernho@cais.com writes: >OK, OK, so maybe I was too quick in asking for Ada-95 success stories. >After reviewing the ACVC status for the various compilers from AdaIC, >I gather no compiler is ready for heavy duty software development. Be >that as it may, I'd really like to see early Ada-95 experiences from >the trenches posted here. > >Keep in touch, >Mark Mark, gnat is very much ready, and did a great job for us!! jim