From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,66383f4b94d281e6 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: bowmanc@ns1.sw-eng.falls-church.va.us (Carl Bowman) Subject: Re: Ada-95 Success Stories Date: 1996/05/22 Message-ID: <4nv2ts$n8k@ns1.sw-eng.falls-church.va.us>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 156100740 sender: Carl Bowman references: <319a6322.2564997@news.cais.com> organization: None newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1996-05-22T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <319a6322.2564997@news.cais.com>, Mark Doernhoefer wrote: >Hey Gang, > >It's 1996 and there are several validated Ada-95 compilers available. >Can anybody post an Ada-95 success story? (Ulterior motive: I'd like >to know which compiler is mature enough for serious software >development.) Please provide details of your experience including >host, target, rough SLOC count or relative size measure, compiler >vendor and version, and which specialized needs annexes were critical >to your development. > >Please post to the newsgroup so open discussion can follow up. > >THANKS, >Mark > The Ada Information Clearinghouse has reported on projects that used Ada 95 in our summer newsletter. The URL, if you are interested, is http://sw-eng.falls-church.va.us/AdaIC/news/Newsletter/9508/summer95.html. Perhaps these articles can serve as a springboard for discussion. If the Ada Information Clearinghouse can provide more information , we will be happy to join the discussion, but remember, we can't express opinion. Carl Bowman Ada Information Clearinghouse